Human editors use their judgment to ignore such suggestions and edit the document as per the context. Grammarly’s algorithm struggles to understand the context, which starts a string of inappropriate suggestions. It is still an AI-backed software that has a lot of catching up to do before taking the place of a human editor.Īs human editors, we are better judges of the tone and choice of words.įor writers, context is the driving force of their content.

There are specific issues with Grammarly too…Īfter using Grammarly for over three years, I have come to understand that even though Grammarly is a sound editing tool, one should not entirely rely on its suggestions. In addition to fixing errors in the text you’re working on, the application enhances your writing abilities.īut, not everything is good in the editing paradise. I sure found out about shortcomings in my writing, such as: This feature helps in enhancing your writing and editing skills. You can even comprehend your poor writing tendencies with its weekly reports. It is exceptionally accurate and outperforms most grammar/spellcheck software.

Grammarly detects the majority of errors and makes recommendations to enhance the quality of your writing. Here’s a summary of my personal experience using Grammarly. When you’ve spent money on an editing tool to make your writing flawless, it’s natural to question its accuracy and consistency. Of course, as a writer, I wanted Grammarly to specifically help me with finding sentence fragmentation, punctuations, flow, and more. Through the course of moving to a paid version of Grammarly, I wanted to be entirely sure about the accuracy of the tool. The dangers of investing in writing aidĬoncerning my personal experience with Grammarly, I have initially used the free tool but later shifted to the premium version.

Grammarly keyboard app review